🔗 Share this article

One of the most recognizable pictures from modern history shows a nude girl, her arms outstretched, her face twisted in pain, her skin scorched and peeling. She can be seen running toward the photographer while fleeing an airstrike during South Vietnam. Nearby, youngsters are fleeing out of the bombed village in Trảng Bàng, amid a scene of thick fumes along with soldiers.

This International Effect of an Powerful Photograph

Just after its publication in June 1972, this image—formally called The Terror of War—turned into an analog hit. Witnessed and discussed globally, it's broadly hailed for energizing global sentiment critical of the US war during that era. One noted author later commented how this profoundly unforgettable picture featuring the young Kim Phúc in agony likely was more effective to heighten popular disgust toward the conflict compared to a hundred hours of broadcast violence. A legendary English photojournalist who reported on the fighting labeled it the single best image from what became known as “The Television War”. Another seasoned war journalist declared that the picture is in short, one of the most important images in history, specifically of that era.

The Decades-Long Claim and a Modern Assertion

For over five decades, the image was assigned to the work of a South Vietnamese photographer, an emerging local photojournalist on assignment for a major news agency in Saigon. However a controversial recent film streaming on a global network contends which states the iconic image—often hailed as the peak of war journalism—may have been shot by someone else present that day in Trảng Bàng.

As presented in the documentary, the iconic image may have been taken by a stringer, who sold his photos to the organization. The claim, and the film’s subsequent inquiry, began with a man named Carl Robinson, who claims how the powerful editor instructed him to alter the photo's byline from the original photographer to the staff photographer, the one agency photographer on site that day.

The Investigation for Answers

Robinson, now in his 80s, contacted a filmmaker recently, requesting assistance to identify the uncredited photographer. He mentioned how, if he was still living, he wished to offer a regret. The investigator reflected on the independent photographers he knew—seeing them as modern freelancers, who, like independent journalists at the time, are routinely marginalized. Their efforts is commonly questioned, and they function under much more difficult conditions. They lack insurance, no retirement plans, minimal assistance, they often don’t have proper gear, and they remain extremely at risk as they capture images in familiar settings.

The investigator wondered: “What must it feel like for the man who captured this image, should it be true that he was not the author?” From a photographic perspective, he speculated, it would be deeply distressing. As an observer of war photography, specifically the highly regarded war photography from that war, it might be earth-shattering, maybe reputation-threatening. The respected legacy of the photograph within the diaspora was so strong that the creator whose parents left at the time was reluctant to take on the project. He stated, I hesitated to disrupt the established story that Nick had taken the picture. And I didn’t want to disturb the current understanding among a group that always respected this accomplishment.”

This Search Develops

Yet the two the journalist and his collaborator agreed: it was important posing the inquiry. When reporters must hold everybody else accountable,” noted the journalist, it is essential that we can address tough issues about our own field.”

The film tracks the journalists while conducting their research, from eyewitness interviews, to call-outs in present-day Saigon, to archival research from other footage taken that day. Their search eventually yield a candidate: Nguyễn Thành Nghệ, a driver for a news network during the attack who sometimes worked as a stringer to the press on a freelance basis. In the film, a heartfelt the man, now also in his 80s based in California, claims that he handed over the photograph to the agency for $20 and a print, yet remained plagued by the lack of credit for decades.

The Response and Further Analysis

Nghệ appears throughout the documentary, thoughtful and reflective, yet his account turned out to be explosive within the world of journalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to